
SMFSC has proposed unbundling investment research payments from trading commissions to enhance transparency and reduce conflicts of interest. The new model requires clear cost disclosure and aims to improve research quality for investors.
SMFSC Unveils Plans to Reform How Investment Research Is Funded
The San Marino Financial Standard Council (SMFSC) has announced proposals to introduce a new model for paying for investment research, aiming to increase transparency, reduce conflicts of interest, and enhance the quality of market analysis available to investors.
The move forms part of SMFSC’s broader strategy to modernize San Marino’s financial services landscape and align it with global best practices in research independence and investor protection.
Investment research has long played a vital role in helping asset managers and institutional investors make informed decisions.
However, under traditional funding models, research costs were often bundled into trading commissions, creating potential conflicts of interest and reducing cost transparency for end investors.
SMFSC’s proposal seeks to decouple research payments from trading activities, ensuring that investors can clearly identify how much they pay for research and what value they receive in return.
“Our objective is to create a system that rewards quality, independence, and transparency,” an SMFSC spokesperson explained.
“By reforming how research is funded, we strengthen trust in the information that guides investment decisions.”
The new funding approach proposed by SMFSC includes several key elements:
This model mirrors successful practices adopted in leading financial jurisdictions while reflecting SMFSC’s own commitment to self-regulatory innovation.
SMFSC emphasized that the proposed framework aims to strike a balance between transparency and practicality, ensuring smaller investment firms are not overburdened by administrative complexity.
The council is exploring proportional compliance measures that would allow firms of different sizes to adopt the model smoothly.
At the same time, SMFSC’s consultation paper invites feedback from investment managers, brokers, research providers, and investor groups, ensuring that the final framework reflects diverse industry perspectives.
By increasing visibility around how research is funded and consumed, SMFSC hopes to strengthen market integrity and restore investor confidence in financial analysis.
The council noted that transparent payment structures not only promote better research quality but also encourage competition among research providers, leading to improved insights for the market as a whole.
“High-quality, independent research is the cornerstone of sound investment,” SMFSC stated.
“Our reforms ensure that value—not volume—drives the research ecosystem.”
SMFSC’s consultation on the new research payment model will remain open for several months.
Following stakeholder feedback, the council plans to publish finalized guidance and implementation timelines later in 2025.
Firms will then be expected to transition to the new framework gradually, with SMFSC providing support and educational materials to assist compliance.
The SMFSC’s proposal represents a forward-looking reform that places transparency, independence, and investor trust at the heart of market practice.
By redefining how research is paid for, the council is laying the foundation for a more accountable and innovation-driven investment ecosystem—one that ensures financial information serves the public good, not hidden incentives.